Folks go ahead and sound the alarms because it's going to get way way worse. There are massive food shortages and mass scale rationing is already being planned. On top of that, the global Elite are already trying to manufacture some scarcity on their own to fit their agenda and they aren't even hiding it anymore in this video. I'm going to go through everything that you need to know.

Okay, so to start not only our food shortages popping up everywhere, but now you've got policy researchers actually actively prescribing Mass scale rations if you remember, during the pandemic, you went to a supermarket. Many areas would say due to the pandemic, we are experiencing X shortages and thus each customer is limited to x amount of an item. This was especially common with meats and produce and foods that have an expiration date basically foods that aren't processed, crap that have a actual shelf life. And then last year the same thing happened with baby formula.

Due to shortages, we can only allow each customer to buy two cans of baby formula. And then very recently this happened with eggs as well. Many grocery markets would say and still say due to Statewide egg shortage, we must limit purchase to one dozen eggs per customer even if you want to pay up the Wazoo at Whole Foods Well, they were limiting it to two cartons per customer in many areas. and if you're in Europe There's a ton of fruit and vegetable shortages right now with similar situations, and these are just a few of the widely covered examples that we've seen the last few years Of mass scale shortages and limiting of customers to certain specified rations.

And for these, there's definitely real reason cited for these shortages: pandemic worker shortages, contamination of baby formula, avian flu destroying the egg production. But the problem is that now that Americans and westerners in general are used to dealing with shortages and limitations, while policy researchers are now trying to jump to try to normalize this while they have the opportunity. Fox News Reports: government should consider imposing World War II style policies of rationing on Goods such as food Fuel and clothing in order to fight climate change according to a newly published academic paper. So as if keeping us in 15-minute confined cities that we talked about last week weren't enough, now they want to ration our food, fueling clothing so not just rash in the distance we can travel from our home.

Now they want to ration everything that we do in our home that we consume so on and so forth. Researchers at the University of Leeds a top British institution wrote in the Journal of Ethics Policy and Environment that rationing has been wrongfully neglected as a policy option for mitigating climate change. Arguing such an approach would be more effective than the slow and inequitable results from tax hikes to promote a green agenda. Although, don't worry, they're also going to be proposing those tax hikes as well.

well. But really I wonder why food rationing has been neglected? What a What a shame! we've been thinking about all these other Solutions But we haven't thought of such an easy solution such as food rationing. Just restrict what people eat. Obviously, why not just restrict the number of kids people have too? Less people means less emissions.

It's not like other countries haven't tried that. We argue that rationing could help States reduce emissions rapidly and fairly. The academic paper States The authors added that the rejection of markets and a commitment to Fair shares is a key part of the value of rationing and precisely what made rationing attractive to the public in the 1940s. So there's two big phrases here that you want to pay attention to: rejection of markets and commitment to fair share.

The main goal behind this and many other proposed climate policies is very, very obvious. If you simply look at what's in front of you, it's to reject markets and switch the market system that we have in place onto something that is entirely entirely government controlled and government ran. This is the goal of these policies. It's not to fix the climate, it's to put government in control of everything.

The way that they're going to convince people to agree to. this is by saying that markets are inherently evil, are responsible for climate change, and aren't giving you your fair share if you feel like you don't have enough money, If you feel like capitalism hasn't worked for you, they'll say yeah, that's just the market system. Trust the politicians to allocate it for you. And who decides what a fair share or Fair ration is the government.

Of course. the academics pointed to World War II as a model for rationing supplies to the public, claiming that while a rationing system is perceived as unattractive, oh no, it's perceived as unattractive, huh? While many who experienced it did not have a negative experience I Don't know about you anecdotal, but a lot of my family that was here during that period of time, they had a negative experience with it. I Heard a ton of awful stories growing up, but what is the message they're trying to say here? They're saying many who experienced rationing did not have a negative experience and they are trying to send the message that hey, people want they want and prefer to be told by government how much of something they can have individual people. They're too stupid to make decisions themselves.

They have to let the government and academic Elite decide what is best for them and what their fair share is. And by the way folks, if you're against this kind of policy, that means that you're against the Earth That means you hate the environment. That means that you hate future generations of humans who may have a slightly warmer temperature. This goes on.

Further, specifically, governments could ration various Goods such as flights, petrol, household energy, and even meat or clothing according to the paper, which also suggests limiting the number of long-haul flights an individual could make in a year or the amount of petrol one can buy in a month. So, once again, similar to the 15-minute City ideology, they are trying to limit movement. This is about limiting movement. They say they're trying to ration flights, they want to limit car transportation and now they want to limit food and other Goods as well.

It's all about how can we limit the amount of Freedom an individual has. Let's make sure we keep them in a very, very confined space that the government has to approve if they want to go to another space. And when they're in that space, let's make sure that we're controlling what they're consuming and they're going to be willing to do it because we're going to. Virtue Signal to them that if we aren't limiting their freedom of choice, then they're going to be destroying the planet.

maybe potentially over the next 500 years of course. Don't worry though, there's going to be exceptions for politicians and their families and people they're connected to, but everybody else like you. And I No, no, no, no limit it. Another way to roll out the rationing scheme could be carbon cards to track one's carbon allowance.

Now, this is very much in line with what the World Economic Forum is proposing. A world where you have some form of digital ID that tracks your movements and ensures that you're not emitting too much God forbid you go to Taco Bell and you omit what happens after Taco Bell If the World Economic Forum is going to have a heart attack, but this is serious stuff. If you look on their website, it shows a planned application that tracks your missions via your iPhone if you've gone over your personal emissions, perhaps you got to stay inside for the rest of the month and I know what you're thinking. Charlie I Would be willing to stay inside for the rest of my life if it lowers the temperature of the environment by potentially one degree.

In the next three, four, five hundred years, I would be willing to do that. Okay, that's fine and you're welcome to do that. but that doesn't mean that I want to do that. That doesn't mean that I Think everybody should be forced to do that.

The World Economic Forum markets this as saying: oh, this is my Carbon an approach for inclusive and sustainable cities. So they'll say what. Well, if you are against our Solutions you must also be against sustainability. You must also be against inclusion.

You must also be against this or that. And thus, you are a monster if you don't agree 100 with our Solutions If you say no, we don't agree with your Solutions because they suck then you're going to be considered a monster and you're not going to be allowed to share your opinion personally. I Think there's tons and tons of problems with our environment and how we handle it in emissions and different chemicals and so on and so forth. I Think there's tons and tons of problems in society that need to be dealt with I Just disagree with their Solutions on how to deal with them and that's a really key distinction.

It's not that I disagree with the problems, it's the solutions. Any solution that involves giving everybody's power away to the political Elite is in my opinion, at least a bad solution now. I Know they will say it's a good solution, but I disagree with that. but this is how they're going to sell you on rations on control on limiting you in a 15-minute city.

They're going to say you need to do this. We know best and again. I'm sure that they're going to have tons of exceptions for themselves. It's weird how policy makers always put exceptions for themselves in their own policies.

It's really, really crazy how that happens. So don't miss the point here folks. These policies aren't really being proposed as a way to save the climate, but are being proposed as a way to change the economy to match a different world view. It's a genius way of doing it and a genius way of converting people.

Sure if we all decided to eat less or perhaps we just ate nothing at all or just decided to die, then yeah, we'd create less emissions. They are right. You can't debate that and it's not like there's not an obesity problem, but that's not the point. The point is that climate is not the main goal here.

it's control. It's power. and it's a complete revision of the global economy and how it operates. When someone proposes climate policies that are more interested in Banning markets than they are in protecting the Earth they are using the climate as a clear Patsy to gain political traction for their ideas that otherwise would never fly.

And in Western countries, especially here in the US the concept of rationing food food in a time of relative peace, at least domestic peace would never fly. So what do you have to do? Well, you have to make sure that people know no, just because we have an abundance of food. Well, guess what? There is a crisis. There is a crisis that we have to ration for.

And that crisis is the climate. Something that most scientists agree is a crisis, but is very, very poorly defined, has a very open to interpretation timeline, and has very open-ended possible responses. Something that gives policy makers a lot of wiggle room to put themselves in as the solution and take away as many freedoms as possible. Meanwhile, Virtue signaling that if you don't like what they're doing, you must hate future.

Generations It's really genius. A real issue with a proposed solution that just coincidentally gives them complete control over everything. And if this is not enough, the policy researchers here are proposing manufacturing the scarcity problem with rationing energy. For example, the researchers note is people might not be as willing to accept it as they would if resources were scarce because they know there's an abundance of resources available.

They suggest therefore regulating fossil fuels through limitations on activities such as oil exploration, long-haul flights, and intensive farming to create a scarcity in products that harm the planet. Then rationing could be introduced gradually to manage the subsequent scarcity. So here they're literally saying, oh, we're going to go ahead and manufacture scarcity so that people are willing to restrict themselves and they're willing to allow the government to restrict them. We're going to do it slowly.

and if you read between the lines here, they're already doing a lot of this. They're already putting limitations on exploration. They're already putting a lot of limitations on commodity mining. They're already putting a lot of limitations on all of this, and as they do that over time, it's going to create what more artificial scarcity, which they can then use as proof that we need.

We need these government rations. We need everybody to be controlled on what they're consuming. But Charlie This sounds insane. Why are you platforming these wild conspiracy theories? There's no way that climate rationing would ever happen aside from what's already happening.

but there's no way more of it would happen. I Disagree. This is what's called moving the Overton window. The Overton window is this Theory where within the window you have what's considered the allowable range of public policy and conversation.

But then as the conversation gets more and more extreme in One Direction or the other, the frame of what policies are allowed switch from Unthinkable or radical to suddenly acceptable, sensible, and then popular. And then it actually becomes policy. This is the first stage of this. At first, maybe 20 years ago, you say, oh, let's ban all gasoline cars people say what, that's ridiculous Unthinkable and completely radical.

Then the biggest state in the Union goes ahead and enacts that policy and people are like, yeah, that's pretty reasonable. Then you say, oh, we need to climb it, Ration and climate control, People's movement and climate lock people in 15-minute cities and then 15 years later, 20 years later, all of a sudden, that's what's happening. And how do you actually make this so that this moves very, very rapidly? Well, you have to convince people that this is an emergency. You have to tell people, emergency, emergency, Don't think, don't think We have to make the decisions really really fast.

It's an emergency. Urgent Urgent urgent. And then all of a sudden all your rides are gone and you're locked in these little cities. And if you complain, it's because you're selfish.

This is a strategy that works on a slippery slope and over a long enough time. Horizon If you go back 40 years, the concept of destroying your economy and forcing expensive green energy ahead of its development was not very popular or even implementable today. It's incredibly popular all across the West. In fact, it's so popular that countries like Germany would rather buy dirty energy from geopolitical adversary Russia than make it themselves again.

If they were actually concerned if they were actually concerned with the environment and not just this overall narrative, then then they wouldn't be buying dirty energy from anybody. This has nothing to do with climate change or protecting the Earth It's all about expanding the government. Now, if you want to hear my personal thoughts: I Am not anti-government I Do think that government should have a role in policing the marketplace and at times instituting incentives to encourage behaviors that it wants and discourage behaviors that it doesn't want. Just look at the Tesla subsidies and the success that that has had at bringing people to electric cars in a way that isn't taking away your freedoms.

Government has a role in policing the marketplace and creating limited but effective regulations that work for all of us many times. And you got to be real here. Many times. corporations take advantage and screw everyday people and exploit the system.

You see that in so many different. Industries Just look at big Pharma Just look at Big Oil Even look at Big Tech If we're being honest, a lot of times they get away with this by actually going and bribing the government to create unjust favors for them. But that being said, well, the marketplace nor the government are perfect. I Do think that there's a balance here that can be struck without the government going and taking over everything.

There's a huge difference between limited government that works for the people and limited people that work for the government and the reason that I'm talking about this and why it's so important for you to know this is because you're going to see this idea being pushed. that it's only the government, total government control of you, your family, and everything in this country that is going to solve and help us prepare for this climate emergency That's going to be the only the only solution that you're going to see pushed. And if you say anything to critique that they're going to say that you're denying the science or whatever it is behind it. No, no, no, no, no.

you may agree with the problem. You may not agree with the problem, but it's the solution. It's the solution that is the biggest issue here, not the problem. We can agree or disagree on the problem, but it's the solution that is really, really, really hard to get your mind around Whenever somebody tells you, hey, you need to give up all your freedoms so that we can perhaps save the climate, Ask them about realistic solutions to the climate and why they aren't talking about those.

So folks, my view, do not fall for this game am. it's a complete and utter scam and you need to make sure that you're informed on these issues so that you can look at practical Solutions not ones that just push a ulterior motive. Most people that are on the left or right in the United States and in a lot of Western countries are very very close to Center and they're willing to hear Solutions and they're willing to talk about problems and different ways that you could solve those problems. But when you start slowly introducing this kind of rhetoric, people get used to that idea of hey, okay, maybe it is fine if the government just takes over my life because I need to do that for the greater good.

Remember that is not the only solution here and it's not a real solution anyways. odds are strong. Even if they had complete control, we wouldn't be able to reverse anything. Let's just be real there.

Okay, so anyways, that caps off today's video. Make sure to hit that ravish and like button and subscribe and we will see you in the next video.